Friday, September 14, 2007

Concensus Found That Refutes Global Warming

The co-authors of the new book Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1,500 Years, Dennis Avery and Fred Singer, have compiled a list of 500 scientists who have published studies that disagree with at least one element of current global warming theory. They compiled the list through an analysis of peer-reviewed literature. According to their research, warm cycles happen with regularity, about every 1470 years, and moreover, they are good for us.

More than 300 of the scientists found evidence that 1) a natural moderate 1,500-year climate cycle has produced more than a dozen global warmings similar to ours since the last Ice Age and/or that 2) our Modern Warming is linked strongly to variations in the sun's irradiance. "This data and the list of scientists make a mockery of recent claims that a scientific consensus blames humans as the primary cause of global temperature increases since 1850," said Hudson Institute Senior Fellow Dennis Avery.

Other researchers found evidence that 3) sea levels are failing to rise importantly; 4) that our storms and droughts are becoming fewer and milder with this warming as they did during previous global warmings; 5) that human deaths will be reduced with warming because cold kills twice as many people as heat; and 6) that corals, trees, birds, mammals, and butterflies are adapting well to the routine reality of changing climate.

Avery, a Senior Fellow of The Hudson Institute and Singer,a climate physicist, noted that there are hundreds of additional peer-reviewed studies that have found cycle evidence, and that they will publish additional researchers' names and studies. They also noted that their book was funded by Wallace O. Sellers, a Hudson board member, without any corporate contributions.

"We have had a Greenhouse Theory with no evidence to support it-except a moderate warming turned into a scare by computer models whose results have never been verified with real-world events," said co-author Singer. "On the other hand, we have compelling evidence of a real-world climate cycle averaging 1470 years (plus or minus 500) running through the last million years of history. The climate cycle has above all been moderate, and the trees, bears, birds, and humans have quietly adapted."

"Two thousand years of published human histories say that the warm periods were good for people," says Avery. "It was the harsh, unstable Dark Ages and Little Ice Age that brought bigger storms, untimely frost, widespread famine and plagues of disease." "There may have been a consensus of guesses among climate model-builders," says Singer. "However, the models only reflect the warming, not its cause." He noted that about 70 percent of the earth's post-1850 warming came before 1940, and thus was probably not caused by human-emitted greenhouse gases. The net post-1940 warming totals only a tiny 0.2 degrees C.

Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years is available from


stimmedeshern said...

Man, this is getting better by the minute.

The two clowns Singer and Avery claim in a pr-release that they found evidence that there is no consensus.

Of course they don't back it up, though it's incredibly clear that they are once again up to their old tricks.

And now the anti-science-blogosphere picks it up and lo and behold, they now even claim that a consensus was discovered.

Andrea said...

Putting credence in one scientific theory over another doesn't make you anti-science, even if others disagree with your reasoning.

Simply calling people clowns and claiming they have no evidence, when it is clear that the entire study was about evidence that they have found which you just have not yet read, weakens your argument considerably.

Even Al Gore gets attacked by his own side occasionally, and when it is done unfairly, this blog says so. I would point you to the articles about Gore and the vegetarians and Gore and the toothfish non-scandal.